On the Evidence for a Common-spectrum Process in the Search for the Nanohertz Gravitational-wave Background with the Parkes Pulsar Timing Array

Goncharov, Boris and Shannon, R. M. and Reardon, D. J. and Hobbs, G. and Zic, A. and Bailes, M. and Curyło, M. and Dai, S. and Kerr, M. and Lower, M. E. and Manchester, R. N. and Mandow, R. and Middleton, H. and Miles, M. T. and Parthasarathy, A. and Thrane, E. and Thyagarajan, N. and Xue, X. and Zhu, X.-J. and Cameron, A. D. and Feng, Y. and Luo, R. and Russell, C. J. and Sarkissian, J. and Spiewak, R. and Wang, S. and Wang, J. B. and Zhang, L. and Zhang, S. (2021) On the Evidence for a Common-spectrum Process in the Search for the Nanohertz Gravitational-wave Background with the Parkes Pulsar Timing Array. The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 917 (2). L19. ISSN 2041-8205

[thumbnail of Goncharov_2021_ApJL_917_L19.pdf] Text
Goncharov_2021_ApJL_917_L19.pdf - Published Version

Download (2MB)

Abstract

A nanohertz-frequency stochastic gravitational-wave background can potentially be detected through the precise timing of an array of millisecond pulsars. This background produces low-frequency noise in the pulse arrival times that would have a characteristic spectrum common to all pulsars and a well-defined spatial correlation. Recently the North American Nanohertz Observatory for Gravitational Waves collaboration (NANOGrav) found evidence for the common-spectrum component in their 12.5 yr data set. Here we report on a search for the background using the second data release of the Parkes Pulsar Timing Array. If we are forced to choose between the two NANOGrav models—one with a common-spectrum process and one without—we find strong support for the common-spectrum process. However, in this paper, we consider the possibility that the analysis suffers from model misspecification. In particular, we present simulated data sets that contain noise with distinctive spectra but show strong evidence for a common-spectrum process under the standard assumptions. The Parkes data show no significant evidence for, or against, the spatially correlated Hellings–Downs signature of the gravitational-wave background. Assuming we did observe the process underlying the spatially uncorrelated component of the background, we infer its amplitude to be $A={2.2}_{-0.3}^{+0.4}\times {10}^{-15}$ in units of gravitational-wave strain at a frequency of 1 yr−1. Extensions and combinations of existing and new data sets will improve the prospects of identifying spatial correlations that are necessary to claim a detection of the gravitational-wave background.

Item Type: Article
Subjects: Archive Science > Physics and Astronomy
Depositing User: Managing Editor
Date Deposited: 09 May 2023 09:03
Last Modified: 14 Aug 2025 03:33
URI: http://catalog.journals4promo.com/id/eprint/816

Actions (login required)

View Item
View Item